More than 1 million Americans will lose supplemental unemployment benefits in 14 states

Today News ||

Brian Kemp, governor of Georgia.

Elijah Nouvelage | Bloomberg | Getty Images

More than 1 million Americans will lose unemployment benefits early as a result of states’ decisions to cut off federal aid to workers.


By Thursday morning, at least 14 states, all led by Republican governors, had announced they would end their participation in pandemic-era unemployment programs.

As a result, workers will no longer get a $300 weekly supplement to benefits. Those ineligible for state-level benefits — like the long-term unemployed, self-employed and gig workers — will lose aid entirely.

More from Personal Finance:
New $1,400 stimulus checks include ‘plus-up’ and first-time payments
High cost of child care, lack of paid leave hold back many parents
Senators call on FTC to guard against travel scams

Some states are cutting off benefits as early as June 12 and others as late as July 3 — more than two months before their official expiration. The American Rescue Plan offers the aid to Sept. 6.

The governors’ withdrawal will impact 895,000 workers in a dozen states, according to an analysis published Thursday by The Century Foundation, a left-leaning think tank.

The states include Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Iowa, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah and Wyoming.

They will forgo a cumulative $4.7 billion in assistance, according to the report.

Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp also announced his state would exit the federal programs Thursday morning, after The Century Foundation analysis was published. South Dakota will also forgo the federal aid, Gov. Kristi Noem said.

That would impact an additional 250,000 people, according to a CNBC analysis of Labor Department data.

‘Domino effect’

The federal programs in question have been in place since the CARES Act was passed in March 2020. Montana was the first state to opt out of the federal aid, on May 4.

“It’s absolutely a domino effect,” Andrew Stettner, a senior fellow at The Century Foundation, said of the state actions. “It’s a very drastic move to pull out of this type of program.”

State officials said they’re ending participation early due to labor shortages in their respective states.

They claim enhanced unemployment benefits are causing workers to stay home instead of return to work, leaving businesses struggling to fill open jobs.

It’s a similar argument Republican lawmakers made last year when they pushed back against Democrats’ wishes to extend a $600-a-week federal enhancement to state benefits.

“Every small business owner and the workers that are currently working, they need more people,” Kemp said Thursday. “It is hurting our productivity not only in Georgia, but across the country.”

Critics say enhanced benefits aren’t driving the shortage in available workers. Pandemic-era factors like erratic school openings, child-care duties, a lingering virus threat and relatively low vaccinations to date among working-age Americans have kept people sidelined, they said.  

Opting out of federal jobless funding also removes money that may otherwise be pumped into the economy, perhaps diluting demand and the need for additional workers, they said.

Disparate impact

Ending benefits early would also have a disproportionate impact on minorities, according to worker advocates.

For example, 50% of unemployment recipients in South Carolina are Black, as are 54% and 66% of those in Alabama and Mississippi, respectively — roughly three times the 18% national average, according to The Century Foundation.

Some experts think the U.S. Labor Department may be able to prevent the loss of benefits for the self-employed, gig workers and others who receive aid through the federal Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program.

The U.S. Labor Department has the legal power to keep that aid flowing due to specific wording in the CARES Act, which established the program, according to a National Employment Law Project letter sent Tuesday to Labor Secretary Marty Walsh.

A Labor Department official acknowledged receipt of the letter but declined to comment.

More Economy Business News Updates of Today Check Below

Today News || Business Today || World News || Headlines Today || Health || Technology News || Education News


Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button